Watch: Saudi king would not last 'two weeks' in power without US support: Trump
A lone Cuban flag is raised inside the 'Wall of Flags' across the street from the U.S. Embassy August 13, 2015 in Havana, Cuba. Cuba planted 138 flag poles in February 2006 in an attempt to obscure an electronic message ticker on the outside of the US Interests Section building. Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
Cuba on Thursday presented its most detailed defence to date against US accusations that American diplomats in Havana were subjected to mysterious sonic attacks that left them with a variety of ailments including headaches, hearing problems and concussions.
In a half-hour, prime-time special titled Alleged Sonic Attacks, Cuban officials attempted to undermine the Trump administration’s assertion that 24 US officials or their relatives had been subjected to deliberate attacks by a still-undetermined culprit.
Many officials reported being subjected to loud, grating noises before falling ill. The US has not accused Cuba of carrying out the attacks, but says that Cuba has not met its obligation to protect diplomats on its territory.
The television special pointed out what it alleged was a lack of evidence for the US accusations.
It argued the United States had failed to show that such attacks had actually occurred because it had not given Cuba or the public access to the testimony or medical records of US officials who reported attacks, despite three visits to Cuba by US investigators in June, August and September.
“The members of the U.S. delegation said they don’t have evidence that confirms that these reported attacks occurred, and brought up that there was no working theory about the cause of the health problems reported by their diplomats,” the program’s narrator said.
The narrator said Cuba had undertaken an exhaustive investigation ordered by “the highest government authorities”, a clear reference to President Raul Castro. Cuba did not possess any technology capable of carrying out a sonic attack and importing it was prohibited by law, according to the special.
“Its entering the country could only take place illegally,” the narrator said.
The creators of the report interviewed neighbours of the affected diplomats who said they had not heard any strange sounds or suffered any symptoms, which the special presented as another purported weakness in the US allegations. It said security around US diplomats’ homes had been dramatically increased.
The US State Department declined to comment at length on the Cuban critique, saying Thursday that, “the safety and well being of American citizens is our top priority … We are continuing our investigation into the attacks, and the Cuban government has told us they will continue their efforts as well.”
The US has cut staffing at its Havana embassy by 60% in response to the incidents, expelled Cuban diplomats from the embassy in Washington, issued a travel warning for Americans going to Cuba and stopped issuing visas for Cubans in Havana.
Thursday night’s special did not present an alternate explanation for the facts presented by US officials, with one significant exception.
Officials with Cuba’s Interior Ministry said that US investigators had presented them with three recordings made by presumed victims of sonic attacks and that analysis of the sounds showed them to be extremely similar to those of crickets and cicadas that live along the northern coast of Cuba.
“It’s the same bandwidth and it’s audibly very similar,” said Lieutenant Colonel Juan Carlos Molina, a telecommunications specialist with the Interior Ministry. “We compared the spectrums of the sounds and evidently this common sound is very similar to the sound of a cicada.”
The programme’s narrator said that unnamed “North American researchers” had found that some cicada and cricket noises could be louder than 90-95 decibels, enough to produce hearing loss, irritation and hypertension in situations of prolonged exposure.Source: AP